Product

Bring documents, evidence and decisions together.

Keep originals, inspect sources and track open questions and actions. Pilot preparation lets us check this workflow with your team.

Status quo

Today this is done by hand.

Documents and previous answers often sit in different places.

These figures show LkSG and CSRD requests in a 2024 regional IHK survey, by company size. They do not measure time saved with Attestria.

2/3

over 250 employees

IHK Osnabrück, 2024

40 %

50 to 249 employees

IHK Osnabrück, 2024

>1/3

under 50 employees

IHK Osnabrück, 2024

~160

companies in the full survey

IHK Osnabrück, 2024

Workflow

Six steps for your review.

Your team carries out the review. Attestria keeps the documents, evidence and decisions together.

01 · Originals

Collect originals

Upload documents. The original files remain available for review.

02 · Sources

Inspect sources

Read relevant passages with their source. Check the content and context.

03 · Evidence

Link evidence

Link selected evidence to your question or action.

04 · Questions

Record open questions

Record what the documents do not settle and what needs follow-up.

05 · Review

Record a decision

Record your review and decide which claim to approve.

06 · Actions

Track actions

Record actions and their status so open issues can be followed up.

Interactive illustration

From source paragraph to reviewable draft.

Choose an example question to see how a source and answer draft can be presented together for human review.

Fictional examples. Displayed scores are not measured answer reliability.
Interactive illustration Ready for review
Incoming question

Do you enforce multi-factor authentication for remote access to systems that process customer data?

Source found ISMS Policy v3.2 · §4.1

Remote access to production systems requires MFA through the central identity provider — mandatory for all employees and contractors.

Grounded draft

The policy requires MFA for remote access to production systems. This excerpt establishes neither technical enforcement nor coverage of every system processing customer data.

Example score 92%

For your review

Inspect the evidence. Record the decision.

A source may support a claim. Your team judges whether it is sufficient for the specific question.

Grounding

Originals

Original files are retained and can be downloaded again for review.

Citations

Citations

Source references make selected evidence available for human review.

Confidence

Assessments

Assessments support review. They do not guarantee that an answer is correct or complete.

Region

Hosting and AI region

Hosted in Germany. Mistral inference is planned for EU and EFTA countries. The processing terms are agreed and checked before customer use.

Human review

Human in the loop

Your team reviews the answer and decides what to approve.

Development

Pilot validation

We test the workflow with fictional cases and are preparing a focused pilot. Customer validation is still ahead.

Next step

Plan a suitable pilot together.

In an initial call, we discuss your workflow. Company documents follow only after the agreed data-handling and quality checks.